Megatest

					     (let ((items      (hash-table-ref/default config "items" #f)) ;; items 4
						   (itemstable (hash-table-ref/default config "itemstable" #f))) 
					       ;; if either items or items table is a proc return it so test running
					       ;; process can know to call items:get-items-from-config
					       ;; if either is a list and none is a proc go ahead and call get-items
					       ;; otherwise return #f - this is not an iterated test
					       (cond
						((procedure? items)      
						 (debug:print 4 "INFO: items is a procedure, will calc later")
						 items)            ;; calc later
						((procedure? itemstable)
						 (debug:print 4 "INFO: itemstable is a procedure, will calc later")
						 itemstable)       ;; calc later
						((filter (lambda (x)
							   (let ((val (car x)))
							     (if (procedure? val) val #f)))
							 (append (if (list? items) items '())
								 (if (list? itemstable) itemstable '())))
						 'have-procedure)
						((or (list? items)(list? itemstable)) ;; calc now
						 (debug:print 4 "INFO: items and itemstable are lists, calc now\n"
							      "    items: " items " itemstable: " itemstable)
						 (items:get-items-from-config config))
						(else #f)))                           ;; not iterated
					     #f      ;; itemsdat 5
					     ;; #f      ;; spare
					     )))
	    (for-each 
	     (lambda (waiton)

		     (hash-table-set! test-records newtestname new-test-record)
		     (set! tal (cons newtestname tal)))))) ;; since these are itemized create new test names testname/itempath
	   items)
	  (loop (car tal)(cdr tal)))

	 ;; if items is a proc then need to run items:get-items-from-config, get the list and loop 
	 ;;    - but only do that if resources exist to kick off the job
	 ((or (procedure? items)(eq? items 'have-procedure))
	  (if (runs:can-run-more-tests db test-record)
	      (let ((items-list (items:get-items-from-config tconfig)))
		(if (list? items-list)
		    (begin
		      (tests:testqueue-set-items! test-record items-list)
		      (loop hed tal))
		    (begin
		      (debug:print 0 "ERROR: The proc from reading the setup did not yield a list - please report this")
		      (exit 1))))
	      (let ((newtal (append tal (list hed))))
		;; if can't run more tests, lets take a breather
		(thread-sleep! 1)
		(loop (car newtal)(cdr newtal)))))

	 ;; this case should not happen, added to help catch any bugs
	 ((and (list? items) itemdat)
	  (debug:print 0 "ERROR: Should not have a list of items in a test and the itemspath set - please report this")
	  (exit 1))))
	
      ;; we get here on "drop through" - loop for next test in queue
      (if (null? tal)
	  (debug:print 1 "INFO: All tests launched")
	  (loop (car tal)(cdr tal))))))

;; parent-test is there as a placeholder for when parent-tests can be run as a setup step
(define (run:test db run-id runname keyvallst test-record flags parent-test)
  ;; All these vars might be referenced by the testconfig file reader
  (let* ((test-name    (tests:testqueue-get-testname   test-record))
	 (test-waitons (tests:testqueue-get-waitons    test-record))
	 (test-conf    (tests:testqueue-get-testconfig test-record))

#!/bin/bash

# megatest -step wasting_time :state start :status n/a -m "This is a test step comment"
# sleep 20
# megatest -step wasting_time :state end :status $?

touch ../I_was_here
mkdir -p $MT_RUN_AREA_HOME/tmp/$USER/$sysname/$fsname/$datapath/$MT_RUNNAME
echo 1 2 3 4 5 > $MT_RUN_AREA_HOME/tmp/$USER/$sysname/$fsname/$datapath/$MT_RUNNAME/the_ans

$MT_MEGATEST -runstep wasting_time -logpro wasting_time.logpro "sleep 8;echo all done eh?" -m "This is a test step comment"

$MT_MEGATEST -load-test-data << EOF
foo,bar,1.2,1.9,>
foo,rab,1.0e9,10e9,1e9
foo,bla,1.2,1.9,<

[setup]

[ezsteps]
lookittmp   ls /tmp
lookithome  ls /home

[requirements]
waiton runfirst
priority 0

[items]
NUMNUM [system cat $MT_RUN_AREA_HOME/tmp/$USER/$sysname/$fsname/$datapath/$MT_RUNNAME/the_ans]

[test_meta]
author matt
owner  bob
description This test runs a single ezstep which is expected to pass, no logpro file.

tags first,single
reviewed 09/10/2011, by Matt