453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
|
(handle-exceptions
exn
#f
(process-signal pid-num signal/kill)))
(process:get-sub-pids pid))))
;; (debug:print-info 0 *default-log-port* "not killing process " pid " as it is not alive"))))
pids)
(tests:test-set-status! run-id test-id "KILLED" "KILLED" (conc (args:get-arg "-m")" "kill-reason) #f))
(begin
(debug:print-error 0 *default-log-port* "Nothing to kill, pid1=" pid1 ", pid2=" pid2)
(tests:test-set-status! run-id test-id "KILLED" "FAILED TO KILL" (conc (args:get-arg "-m")" "kill-reason) #f)
)))
(mutex-unlock! m)
;; no point in sticking around. Exit now.
(exit)))
(if (hash-table-ref/default misc-flags 'keep-going #f)
(begin
(thread-sleep! 3) ;; (+ 3 (random 6))) ;; add some jitter to the call home time to spread out the db accesses
|
>
|
|
|
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
|
(handle-exceptions
exn
#f
(process-signal pid-num signal/kill)))
(process:get-sub-pids pid))))
;; (debug:print-info 0 *default-log-port* "not killing process " pid " as it is not alive"))))
pids)
;; BB: question to Matt -- does the tests:test-state-status! encompass rollup to toplevel? If not, should it?
(tests:test-set-status! run-id test-id "KILLED" "KILLED" (conc (args:get-arg "-m")" "kill-reason) #f)) ;; BB ADDED kill-reason -- confirm OK with Matt
(begin
(debug:print-error 0 *default-log-port* "Nothing to kill, pid1=" pid1 ", pid2=" pid2)
(tests:test-set-status! run-id test-id "KILLED" "FAILED TO KILL" (conc (args:get-arg "-m")" "kill-reason) #f) ;; BB ADDED kill-reason -- confirm OK with Matt
)))
(mutex-unlock! m)
;; no point in sticking around. Exit now.
(exit)))
(if (hash-table-ref/default misc-flags 'keep-going #f)
(begin
(thread-sleep! 3) ;; (+ 3 (random 6))) ;; add some jitter to the call home time to spread out the db accesses
|