Megatest

Diff
Login

Differences From Artifact [dd48ee309d]:

To Artifact [e0e242ce63]:


1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867

1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
                                   (my-item-path (item-list->path my-itemdat))

                                   (newtestname (db:test-make-full-name hed my-item-path)))    ;; test names are unique on testname/item-path
                              (tests:testqueue-set-items!     new-test-record #f)
                              (tests:testqueue-set-itemdat!   new-test-record my-itemdat)
                              (tests:testqueue-set-item_path! new-test-record my-item-path)
                              (hash-table-set! test-records newtestname new-test-record)

                              (set! tal (append tal (list newtestname)))))  ;; since these are itemized create new test names testname/itempath
                          items-in-testpatt)))
          
          

	  ;; At this point we have possibly added items to tal but all must be handed off to 
	  ;; INNER COND logic. I think loop without rotating the queue 
	  ;; (loop hed tal reg reruns))







>
|







1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
                                   (my-item-path (item-list->path my-itemdat))

                                   (newtestname (db:test-make-full-name hed my-item-path)))    ;; test names are unique on testname/item-path
                              (tests:testqueue-set-items!     new-test-record #f)
                              (tests:testqueue-set-itemdat!   new-test-record my-itemdat)
                              (tests:testqueue-set-item_path! new-test-record my-item-path)
                              (hash-table-set! test-records newtestname new-test-record)
			      ;; BUG: This next line sucks up a lot of horsepower
			      (set! tal (append tal (list newtestname)))))  ;; since these are itemized create new test names testname/itempath
                          items-in-testpatt)))
          
          

	  ;; At this point we have possibly added items to tal but all must be handed off to 
	  ;; INNER COND logic. I think loop without rotating the queue 
	  ;; (loop hed tal reg reruns))