Megatest

;; 	  (("WARN" "FAIL")  '("COMPLETED" "FAIL"))
;; 	  (("WARN" "CHECK") '("COMPLETED" "CHECK"))
;; 	  (("WARN" "DEAD")
       
(define (db:set-state-status-and-roll-up-items dbstruct run-id test-name item-path state status comment)
  ;; establish info on incoming test followed by info on top level test
  ;; BBnote - for mode itemwait, linkage between upstream test & matching item status is propagated to run queue in db:prereqs-not-met
  ;; (mutex-lock! *db-transaction-mutex*) ;; why do we need a mutex?
  (let* ((testdat      (if (number? test-name)
			   (db:get-test-info-by-id dbstruct run-id test-name) ;; test-name is actually a test-id
			   (db:get-test-info       dbstruct run-id test-name item-path)))
	 (test-id      (db:test-get-id testdat))
	 (test-name    (if (number? test-name)
			   (db:test-get-testname testdat)
			   test-name))

		    (loop (+ count 1))
		    (sqlite3:with-transaction
		     no-sync-db
		     (lambda ()
		       (db:no-sync-set no-sync-db rollup-lock-key (current-seconds))
		       (db:no-sync-del! no-sync-db waiting-lock-key))))))
	  ;; now the rollup
	  ;; (mutex-unlock! *db-transaction-mutex*) ;; why do we need a mutex?
	  (if rollup-flag ;; put this into a thread
	      (begin
		;; (thread-start! (make-thread
		;; 	      (lambda ()
		(db:roll-up-test-state-status dbstruct run-id test-name state status)
		(db:no-sync-del! no-sync-db rollup-lock-key))
	      ;; (conc "thread for run-id: " run-id " test-name: " test-name))))))))
	      ))
	;; (mutex-unlock! *db-transaction-mutex*) ;; why do we need a mutex?
	)))
	      
;; I'd like to remove the need for item-path - it is logically not needed here
;; for now we pass in state and status - NOTE: There is a possible race if a test
;; is rapidly re-run while an earlier run is waiting to rollup.
;;
(define (db:roll-up-test-state-status dbstruct run-id test-name state status)