1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
|
(mt:test-set-state-status-by-id run-id test-id "NOT_STARTED" "ZERO_ITEMS" "This test has no items which match test pattern.")))
(for-each (lambda (my-itemdat)
(let* ((new-test-record (let ((newrec (make-tests:testqueue)))
(vector-copy! test-record newrec)
newrec))
(my-item-path (item-list->path my-itemdat))
(newtestname (db:test-make-full-name hed my-item-path))) ;; test names are unique on testname/item-path
(tests:testqueue-set-items! new-test-record #f)
(tests:testqueue-set-itemdat! new-test-record my-itemdat)
(tests:testqueue-set-item_path! new-test-record my-item-path)
(hash-table-set! test-records newtestname new-test-record)
(set! tal (append tal (list newtestname))))) ;; since these are itemized create new test names testname/itempath
items-in-testpatt)))
;; At this point we have possibly added items to tal but all must be handed off to
;; INNER COND logic. I think loop without rotating the queue
;; (loop hed tal reg reruns))
;; (let ((newtal (append tal (list hed)))) ;; We should discard hed as it has been expanded into it's items? Yes, but only if this *is* an itemized test
;; (loop (car newtal)(cdr newtal) reg reruns)
(if (null? tal)
|
>
<
|
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
|
(mt:test-set-state-status-by-id run-id test-id "NOT_STARTED" "ZERO_ITEMS" "This test has no items which match test pattern.")))
(for-each (lambda (my-itemdat)
(let* ((new-test-record (let ((newrec (make-tests:testqueue)))
(vector-copy! test-record newrec)
newrec))
(my-item-path (item-list->path my-itemdat))
(newtestname (db:test-make-full-name hed my-item-path))) ;; test names are unique on testname/item-path
(tests:testqueue-set-items! new-test-record #f)
(tests:testqueue-set-itemdat! new-test-record my-itemdat)
(tests:testqueue-set-item_path! new-test-record my-item-path)
(hash-table-set! test-records newtestname new-test-record)
(set! tal (append tal (list newtestname))))) ;; since these are itemized create new test names testname/itempath
items-in-testpatt)))
;; At this point we have possibly added items to tal but all must be handed off to
;; INNER COND logic. I think loop without rotating the queue
;; (loop hed tal reg reruns))
;; (let ((newtal (append tal (list hed)))) ;; We should discard hed as it has been expanded into it's items? Yes, but only if this *is* an itemized test
;; (loop (car newtal)(cdr newtal) reg reruns)
(if (null? tal)
|