Overview
| Comment: | Bad logic on re-calc of prereq needed. The (runs:testdat-prereqs-not-met testdat) is telling you that this needs recalc as it was previously not met. Thus can bypass if *was* met previously (although why would we reach here if it was met previously?). |
|---|---|
| Downloads: | Tarball | ZIP archive | SQL archive |
| Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | v1.65-big-refactor |
| Files: | files | file ages | folders |
| SHA1: |
4e90b83f0b46559b1ee7ec1de3a2442c |
| User & Date: | matt on 2020-10-03 17:58:28 |
| Other Links: | branch diff | manifest | tags |
Context
|
2020-10-03
| ||
| 20:20 | Patched in fix for prereqs-not-met issue. Closed-Leaf check-in: 7ee0b77302 user: matt tags: v1.65-refactor-fix-2, v1.65-failed-testdat (unpublished) | |
| 17:58 | Bad logic on re-calc of prereq needed. The (runs:testdat-prereqs-not-met testdat) is telling you that this needs recalc as it was previously not met. Thus can bypass if *was* met previously (although why would we reach here if it was met previously?). Closed-Leaf check-in: 4e90b83f0b user: matt tags: v1.65-big-refactor (unpublished) | |
|
2020-09-05
| ||
| 13:41 | Try reduced frequency queries for prereq not met. ==/3.5/0.83/PASS/1201/mars/== check-in: 275adb0d10 user: matt tags: v1.65-prereq-qry-freq | |
Changes
Modified db.scm from [2f649dc1fb] to [a8d9328753]. [diff]
Modified runs.scm from [7d76065ab9] to [c68dd6a91f]. [diff]